AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MEGAN ELIZABETH ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff. v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

JEFFREY V. BROWN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 13, 2019, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Dkt. 10. On January 21, 2020, Judge Edison filed a Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 16) recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) be DENIED and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED.

No objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Edison's Memorandum and Recommendation (Dkt. 16) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court;

(2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) is DENIED; and

(3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 14) is GRANTED.



It is so ORDERED.

SIGNED and ENTERED this 11th day of February, 2020.

/s/_________

JEFFREY V. BROWN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Armstrong v. Saul
(Feb 11, 2020)