Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the MATTER OF IDA M. (Anonymous). Gino M. (Anonymous), et al., Petitioners-Appellants; v. Cara Buonincontri, etc., Respondent-Respondent, et al., Nonparty-Respondents.

Leavitt & Kerson, Forest Hills, N.Y. (Paul E. Kerson of counsel), for petitioners—appellants.

Cara Buonincontri, Staten Island, NY, respondent-respondent pro se.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., RUTH C. BALKIN, LEONARD B. AUSTIN, ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Thomas P. Aliotta, J.), dated June 19, 2018. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the petitioners' motion pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.35 to remove Cara Buonincontri as guardian of the person and property of Ida M.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioners' motion pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.35 to remove Cara Buonincontri as guardian of the person and property of Ida M. The petitioners' conclusory allegations did not provide a basis for removal (see Matter of Solomon R. [Michael R.], 123 A.D.3d 934, 935, 999 N.Y.S.2d 435 ; Matter of Carmen H. [Thomas H.—Grace H.], 90 A.D.3d 1049, 935 N.Y.S.2d 516 ; Matter of Mary Alice C., 56 A.D.3d 467, 468, 865 N.Y.S.2d 918 ).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Ida M.
(Apr 17, 2019)