Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Da

Per Curiam.

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas Alan Bahr, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Mindy L. Anderson, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee. David B. Gray, self-represented, Bismarck, N.D., defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. Paul R. Emerson, Assistant Attorney General, Bismarck, N.D., for amicus curiae State of North Dakota.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] David Gray appeals from a judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of preventing arrest. He argues N.D.C.C. § 211-08-02 is unconstitutional because it is vague and the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss. He also argues insufficient evidence supported probable cause to charge him, insufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict, and his sentence was excessive and unlawful. [¶2] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). See State v. Skarsgard, 2007 ND 160, ¶ 6, 739 N.W.2d 786 ("A party's failure to provide a transcript of the proceedings in the district court may prevent the party from prevailing on appeal. We will not review an issue if the record on appeal does not allow for a meaningful and intelligent review of the district court's alleged error." (citations omitted)); State v. Noack, 2007 ND 82, ¶¶ 8, 10, 732 N.W.2d 389 (This Court "will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed," because without adequate briefing and citation to authority, we are unable to meaningfully review alleged errors.); State v. Kensmoe, 2001 ND 190, ¶ 17, 636 N.W.2d 183 ("[A] question not raised or considered in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal."). [¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Gray
(Oct 3, 2019)