Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MARK ANTHONY JONES, Defendant - Appellant.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:05-cr-00083-RBH-1) Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Anthony Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Jones appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222 (2018), confining his appeal to the court's determination that he did not qualify for a sentence reduction because his offenses of conviction were not covered offenses. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Jones' application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jones, No. 4:05-cr-00083-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Jones
(Jul 19, 2019)