Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Dan Cohen, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Samuel I. Glass, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Webber, Oing, JJ.

Alexander M. Dudelson, Brooklyn, for appellants.

Weiss Zarett Brofman Sonnenklar & Levy, P.C., New Hyde Park (Michael J. Spithogiannis of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered January 25, 2018, which granted defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that the issues raised in this action are identical to those sought to be litigated in plaintiffs' prior action, which was dismissed as time barred, a determination from which plaintiffs did not appeal (see Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co., 151 AD3d 504, 505-506 [1st Dept 2017]). Because a dismissal on the ground that the statute of limitations has expired is a determination on the merits for res judicata purposes, the dismissal of the prior lawsuit precludes this action (see Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 194 [1981]).

We have considered plaintiffs' remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 25, 2019

CLERK

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Cohen v. Glass
(Jun 25, 2019)