District Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 92); AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS AND FEES FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS (DOC. 35)
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 92), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation (doc. 92) is ADOPTED in full; and (2) Plaintiff's motion for costs and fees for service of process (doc. 35) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: June 26, 2019
*s/Thomas M. Rose
Thomas M. Rose
United States District Judge