Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In the MATTER OF Keith T. SMITH, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 024721989)

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-389, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(c), Keith T. Smith of Egg Harbor Township , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months based on respondent's guilty plea to simple assault, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2C:12-la3, conduct that violates RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that the suspension should be consecutive to the three-month term of suspension imposed this date in D-83-17 (080676);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Keith T. Smith is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective January 21, 2019, and until the further Order of the Court, and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b) (15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d) ; and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Smith
(Sep 21, 2018)