Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Cynthia Jackson Plaintiff - Appellant v. Target Corporation; Does, John Does 1 - 10 and XYZ Corporation Defendants - Appellees

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

In this diversity action, Arkansas resident Cynthia Jackson appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on her negligence claim. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards, 795 F.3d 832, 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); see also Harvey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 33 F.3d 969, 971 (8th Cir. 1994) (discussing the showing required in slip-and-fall cases under Arkansas law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. --------

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Jackson v. Target Corp.
(Mar 1, 2019)