Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

DANTE MILLER, aka D'ANTE MILLER, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed February 13, 2019, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants. That thirty-day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time ///// ///// may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: March 20, 2019

/s/_________


KENDALL J. NEWMAN


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /mill0237.fusm

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Miller v. Cnty. of Sacramento
(Mar 20, 2019)