AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

A. SCHULTZ, indi v. dually, and on behalf of C. CARGILL, a minor, Plaintiffs,

TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

Upon examination of the Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' allegations fail to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. The Complaint asserts negligence claims against an agency of the State of Oklahoma based on a motor vehicle accident between Plaintiff Alexandra Schultz and an agency employee, pursuant to the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 51, § 151 et seq. The Complaint expressly cites the Act as the basis of jurisdiction. See Compl. ¶ 11.

Federal courts "have an independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party." See Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006); accord 1mage Software, Inc. v. Reynolds & Reynolds Co, 459 F.3d 1044, 1048 (10th Cir. 2006) ("a court may sua sponte raise the question of whether there is subject matter jurisdiction" at any time); see also Gad v. Kan. State Univ., 585 F.3d 1032, 1035 (10th Cir. 2015).

Federal courts have limited subject matter jurisdiction, and a basis of federal jurisdiction must be affirmatively pleaded. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1). Although Plaintiffs appear pro se, they must "follow the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants." Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & Janer, 425 F.3d 836, 840 (10th Cir. 2005); accord United States v. Green, 886 F.3d 1300, 1307 (10th Cir. 2018). Because Plaintiffs' asserted basis for jurisdiction is insufficient, and because no other grounds for an exercise of jurisdiction by this Court are shown by the allegations of the Complaint, the Court finds that the action must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Because the Complaint is dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, the Court does not reach the issue of whether Plaintiff Alexandra Schultz can file suit on behalf of another person without an attorney. --------

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a future filing in an appropriate forum. A separate judgment of dismissal shall be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of March, 2019.

/s/_________


TIMOTHY D. DEGIUSTI


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Schultz ex rel. Cargill v. Okla. Dept. of Transp.
(Mar 5, 2019)