HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge
ORDER :
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [7] on December 3, 2018, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [2]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation [7]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint [2] is dismissed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint curing the noted deficiencies within thirty days, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk's Office is directed to withhold issuance of any summons until further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 3 day of February, 2018.
/s/_________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge