AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

KEVIN MICHAEL DRAYTON, JR., Petitioner, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Respondent.

M. Hannah Lauck United States District Judge

FINAL ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;
2. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED.
3. Drayton's § 2254 Petition (ECF No. 1) is DENIED.
4. Drayton's claims and the action is DISMISSED.
5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.




Should Drayton desire to appeal, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a notice of appeal within that period may result in the loss of the right to appeal.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Drayton and counsel of record.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________


M. Hannah Lauck


United States District Judge Date: NOV 01 2018
Richmond, Virginia

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Drayton v. Clarke
(Nov 1, 2018)