Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Sharon CRANE, Appellant, v. Bartholomew SARACINO, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Leonard P. Cervantes, Jennifer Suttmoeller, Michael T. Flachs, Jr., 1007 Olive Street, 4th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Bruce A. Moothart, Deena B. Jenab, 4801 Main Street, Suite 310, Kansas City, MO 64112, for Respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAMSharon Crane ("Appellant") brought suit against Bartholomew Saracino ("Respondent"), alleging she sustained injuries following a slip and fall on property owned by Respondent. Appellant appeals from the trial court's judgment, following a jury trial, in favor of Respondent.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Crane v. Saracino
(Apr 2, 2018)