AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In re: JEFFREY DAVID FREEMAN and LILA DAPHNE HUMPHREYS, Debtors.

ARTHUR B. BRISKMAN

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 44) filed by the Debtors Jeffrey David Freeman and Lila Daphne Humphreys seeking reconsideration of the Order entered on April 24, 2012 (Doc. No. 43) which denies their request for payment of unclaimed funds of $10,269.32. The unclaimed funds are the property Homeq and shall remain in the registry of the Court unless claimed by Homeq. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041, 2042; In re App. Unclaimed Funds in Exhibit "A", 341 B.R. 65, 69 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2005); see also Leider v. U.S., 301 F.3d 1290, 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (explaining "an unlocated creditor has a property right in his or her distributive share of the funds of a bankruptcy estate.").

The Debtors have presented no newly-discovered evidence or established any manifest errors of law or fact regarding the April 24, 2012 Order. Their Motion for Reconsideration is due to be denied pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9023.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Debtors' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 44) is hereby DENIED.

_________________________


ARTHUR B. BRISKMAN


United States Bankruptcy Judge



Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Freeman
(May 1, 2012)