Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE of Connecticut v. PAUL B.

Glenn W. Falk, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 143 Conn.App. 691, 70 A.3d 1123, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court properly admitted out-of-court statements of the victims as age inappropriate knowledge of the victims? If not, was the error harmful in light of the limiting instruction given?

“2. Did the Appellate Court correctly determine that the trial court properly allowed into evidence the testimony of Officer Kim Parrott which provided the context for the defendant's admission to the conduct underlying the sexual assault charges? If not, was the error harmful?

“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the state did not engage in prosecutorial impropriety during closing argument?”

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Paul B.
(Sep 18, 2013)