Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Interest of J.A.H., child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v. J.A.H., Child; M.U., Mother, R.H., Father, and the Guardian ad Litem, Janice Briese, Respondents. M.U., Mother, Appellant. In the Interest of D.H., child State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee

PER CURIAM.

Quinn P. Fylling, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Justin M. Balzer, Morton County Assistant State's Attorney, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] M.U. appeals from a juvenile court order removing her children and placing them in the custody of Social Services. M.U. argues the children should not be removed and placed in the custody of Social Services because the juvenile court's finding of deprivation was inadequate and not supported by clear and convincing evidence. While retaining jurisdiction under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3), we remanded to the juvenile court to make expedited findings of fact to determine whether the children were deprived. Interest of J.A.H., 2014 ND 196, ¶ 14, 855 N.W.2d 394. Upon review of the juvenile court's expedited findings of fact, on remand, we conclude the juvenile court's findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and, therefore, are not clearly erroneous. We affirm the juvenile court's order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, DALE V. SANDSTROM, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. J.A.H. (In re Interest of J.A.H.)
(Feb 12, 2015)