Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MIKE CLEMONES, PRISCILLA SCOTT, CHARLES EVERETT COBURN, JR., JOSEPH HAROLD JOHNSON, AND WILLIAM ALONZO JOHNSON, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion 8/9/78, 5 Cir., 1978, 577 F.2d 1247).

PER CURIAM:

The opinion is modified by deleting the following language (p. 1255):

Once the existence of a conspiracy is shown only slight evidence is required to warrant submitting to the jury the question of a particular defendant's membership. See, e. g., U.S. v. Baldarrama, 566 F.2d 560, 566 (CA5, 1978).

The petitions for rehearing filed by Edward Raymond LeCompte, William Alonzo Johnson, Jr., Joseph Harold Johnson, Priscilla Scott and Mike Clemones are DENIED, and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

The petition for panel rehearing filed by Kathy Hatmaker is DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Clemones
(Nov 6, 1978)