Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Re: Norman Bradford v. Joseph and Hope Goodwin

Thomas D. Horne, Chief Judge

Thomas K. Plofchan, Jr., Esquire
46308 Cranston Street, Suite 225
Sterling, Virginia 20165 W. Scott Greco, Esquire
1300 Old Chain Bridge Road
McLean, Virginia 22101 Gentlemen:



This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Reconsider. The Court in a letter opinion dated September 10, 2001 determined that the Complainant's agent provided adequate notice of acceptance of a contract for the purchase of real property. Among other things, the Defendants contend that the Court erred when it determined that the Complainant's agent communicated notice of acceptance to the seller's agent. Based on a review of the testimony of the witnesses, the Court finds that the evidence supports its earlier finding and that the motion to reconsider should be denied.

Mr. Plofchan is directed to prepare and present to this Court a decree of specific performance to which both parties may note their exceptions.

However, the Court expects a reply to its inquiry concerning the notation in the billing statement at the time of the presentation of the decree.

Very truly yours,

Thomas D. Horne, Chief Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bradford v. Goodwin
(Oct 9, 2001)