AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

E Yasmina SINGH, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. The METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Halperin & Halperin, P.C., New York (Jeffrey Weiskopf of counsel), for appellant.

Armienti DeBellis Guglielmo & Rhoden, LLP, New York (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for respondents.

the complaint against defendant MTA Bus Company and Shentel Melinda Wright, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court (Barry Salman, J.), entered May 9, 2016, which granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the reargument order.

Under the facts of this case, MTA Bus is equitably estopped from claiming that it is not the proper party defendant (see generally Bender v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 38 N.Y.2d 662, 667–668, 382 N.Y.S.2d 18, 345 N.E.2d 561 [1976] [courts may use doctrine of equitable estoppel to notice of claim situations to ensure that statutes like section 50–e of the General Municipal Law do not become a trap]; Konner v. New York City Tr. Auth., 143 A.D.3d 774, 39 N.Y.S.3d 475 [2d Dept.2016] ).

ACOSTA, P.J., RENWICK, RICHTER, WEBBER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

E Yasmina Singh v. Metro. Transp. Auth.
(Sep 19, 2017)