Per Curiam
FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 3:08-cv-03174-MEJ OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Maria-Elena James, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 16, 2017
Submitted September 17, 2018 San Francisco, California Before: A. Wallace Tashima and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges, and Lynn S. Adelman, District Judge. Per Curiam Opinion COUNSEL James C. Sturdevant (argued), The Sturdevant Law Firm, San Francisco, California; Jessica Riggin and Steven M. Tindall, Rukin Hyland Doria & Tindall LLP, San Francisco, California; Arthur D. Levy, Law Office of Arthur D. Levy, San Francisco, California; for Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Brad W. Seiling (argued), Donald R. Brown, and Joanna S. McCallum, Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Caryn Becker, Oakland, California, as and for Amicus Curiae Center for Responsible Lending. Ted Mermin, Berkeley, California, as and for Amicus Curiae Public Good Law Center. Michael J. Quirk, Williams Cuker Berezofsky LLC, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Amicus Curiae National Association of Consumer Advocates.
The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation. --------
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In light of the judgment of the Supreme Court of California in De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc., No. S241434, 422 P.3d 1004 (Cal. 2018), the judgment of the district court is VACATED and this case is REMANDED to that court for further proceedings consistent with that opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED.