FOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
SUMMARY ORDER
Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court's Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation "summary order"). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel.
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 21st day of August, two thousand eighteen. PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judges, EDWARD R. KORMAN, District Judge.
Judge Edward R. Korman, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. --------
FOR LEAD PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS:
DAVID J. GOLDSMITH (Alfred L. Fatale III, on the brief), Labaton Sucharow LLP, New York, NY.
FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES:
STEPHEN W. TOUNTAS (Michael J. Bowe, on the brief), Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY.
Appeal from a November 2, 2017 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Alison J. Nathan, Judge).
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
Lead Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the judgment of the District Court dismissing their Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal. After reviewing the whole record, we affirm the District Court's judgment for substantially the same reasons as those given by the District Court in its Memorandum & Order at 7-13, 17, Eisner v. Eros Int'l PLC, No. 1:15-cv-08956-AJN (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 2017), ECF No. 79.
CONCLUSION
We have reviewed all of the arguments raised by Lead Plaintiffs-Appellants on appeal and find them to be without merit. The November 2, 2017 judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk