Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

HERMAN-LEE KAOPUA, SR., Petitioner, v. MELINDA K. MENDES, Respondent.

By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0007) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Herman-Lee Kaopua, Sr.'s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on May 21, 2018, court-appointed counsel Melinda Mendes' responses, filed on July 9, 2018 and July 17, 2018, the respective supporting documents, and the record, it appears that, on September 19, 2017, the circuit court entered its "Findings of Fact; Conclusion of Law; Order Denying Petitioner Herman-Lee Kaopua, Sr.'s Writ of Habeas Corpus" in S.P.P. No. 12-1-0007, in which the circuit court denied petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on September 21, 2012, including the supplemental pleadings. Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to an extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 2, 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Kaopua v. Mendes
(Aug 2, 2018)