AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHARM KOSIN, as the personal representati v. of the Estate of Mar

CATHERINE D. PERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant served its written discovery on plaintiff in November 2017. Plaintiff never responded by way of answer or objection despite defendant's repeated requests in January, February, and early March 2018. Plaintiff has now failed to respond to defendant's motion to compel, and the time to do so has passed. I will grant the motion.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company's Motion to Compel [32] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order , plaintiff Charm Kosin shall answer all interrogatories fully, under oath; produce all documents requested; and serve upon defendant a certification that she has fully complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 in her production. All objections to the propounded interrogatories and requests for production are waived.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay defendant its reasonable attorney's fees in preparing and filing its motion to compel.

Failure to comply with this Order will, if requested, result in the entry of sanctions which could include, if requested and among other things, dismissal of the case with prejudice.

/s/_________

CATHERINE D. PERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 2nd day of April, 2018.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Kosin v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
(Apr 2, 2018)