AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

TIMOTHY WATKINS PLAINTIFF v. CORPORAL R. KEMP; and JOHN DOE DEPUTIES 1 to 3 DEFENDANTS

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

OPINION AND ORDER

This is a civil rights case filed by the Plaintiff under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff proceeds pro se and has filed an application (ECF No. 2) to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Plaintiff is incarcerated in the Pine Bluff Unit of the Arkansas Department of Correction.

By Order (ECF No. 3) entered on October 23, 2017, Plaintiff was given until November 8, 2017, to submit a new IFP application. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a new IFP application. He has not requested an extension of time to do so. No mail has been returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court in any way.

Therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute this action and failure to obey the orders of the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 day of December, 2017.

/s/_________


TIMOTHY L. BROOKS


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Watkins v. Kemp
(Dec 1, 2017)