Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

CALIFORNIA CANNABIS COALITION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF UPLAND et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Ct.App. 4/2 E063664 San Bernardino County Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1503985

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT:

The opinion in this matter filed on August 28, 2017, and appearing in the California Official Reports at 3 Cal.5th 924, is modified as follows:

At the end of the paragraph beginning at the bottom of page 931 and ending at the top of page 932, the following footnote is added:

On October 13, 2017, the Governor signed Assembly Bill No. 765, repealing section 9214 effective January 1, 2018. (Stats. 2017, ch. 748, § 6.) After the bill's effective date, initiative proponents will no longer be able to request a special election. Nonetheless, a city council may still choose to hold a special election on an ordinance proposed by initiative petition. (§ 1405, subd. (b), as amended by Stats. 2017, ch. 748, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2018.) Repeal of section 9214 has no effect on the parties' rights and obligations in this action.


This modification does not affect the judgment.

The petition for rehearing, filed on September 12, 2017, is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Coalition v. City of Upland
(Nov 1, 2017)