Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Re Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U.S. 330, 334, 34 L. ed. 464, 466, 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1031, 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 241; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U.S. 502, 508, 40 L. ed. 787, 789, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 689; Bryant v. United States, 167 U.S. 104, 105, 42 L. ed. 94, 95, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 744; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U.S. 270, 278, 46 L. ed. 534, 541, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 12 Am. Crim. Rep. 424; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U.S. 398, 406, 407, 54 L. ed. 253, 256, 257, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 131; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U.S. 520, 523, 57 L. ed. 330, 332, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; (2) David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U.S. 610, 54 L. ed. 636, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 419; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co. 237 U.S. 580, 59 L. ed. 1127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739; Manila Invest. Co. v. Trammell, 239 U.S. 31, 60 L. ed. —, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 12.
Mr. Addison S. Pratt for appellant.
Mr. Charles Fox for appellee.
Comments