AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BENJAMIN TATE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NC PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY OF CHARLOTTE, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:09-cv-00036-MOC-DSC)

Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lena Watts-Robinson, LAW OFFICE OF LEAN WATTS-ROBINSON, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Randall D. Avram, Michael T. Rosenberg, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Tate appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on Tate's claims of disability and race discrimination and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., No. 3:09-cv-00036-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Tate v. NC Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Charlotte
(May 11, 2012)