Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Julio Cesar ROSADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Ne

McDonald & Judd Ltd.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for credit against sentence and amended judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Doug Smith, Judge. Review of the district court minute entries indicate that no written order resolving the motion for credit against sentence has been filed. See Allgood v. State, 78 Nev. 326, 328, 372 P.2d 466, 467 (1962) (appellate jurisdiction not invoked when notice of appeal filed before final judgment). We lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. To the extent appellant is attempting to appeal from the second amended judgment of conviction entered on February 18, 2012, the appeal is untimely because the notice of appeal was filed in the district court on May 7, 2012, well after the 30–day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). See Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994) (“[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.”). To the extent appellant is attempting to appeal from a district court order denying the post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus, review of the district court minute and docket entries indicate that the district court has neither made an oral ruling nor entered a written order resolving the petition. Therefore, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Rosado v. State
(Jun 1, 2012)