Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PATRICK HEURUNG, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, et al., Defendants.

Leo I. Brisbois United States Magistrate Judge

Amended Report and Recommendation

Plaintiff Patrick Heurung did not pay the filing fee for this action, but instead applied for in forma pauperis ("IFP") status. (See, [Docket No. 2]). In an Order dated May 2, 2017, this Court considered Plaintiff's IFP application and denied it, concluding that Plaintiff is capable of paying the $400.00 filing fee without undue hardship. (Order, [Docket No. 4]). The Court afforded Heurung 20 days to pay the normal $400 filing fee and pursue his claims as a non-IFP litigant. (Id.). The Order expressly advised Plaintiff that his case would be subject to summary dismissal unless he paid the $400 filing fee within the 20 days allowed. (Id.).

The deadline for satisfying the requirements of the May 2, 2017, Order has now expired. To date, however, Plaintiff has not paid the $400 filing fee which was due by May 22, 2017, and he has not offered any explanation for his failure to pay the required fee. Thus, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to comply with the requirements set forth in the May 2, 2017, Order within the time allowed.

Based upon the Court's express warning regarding the consequences if Plaintiff failed to timely pay the $400 filing fee, the undersigned hereby recommends that Plaintiff be deemed to have abandoned this action, and that the action be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (stating that actions may be dismissed for failure to comply with court orders).

CONCLUSION

A. Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED THAT:

1. This action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: June 1, 2017

/s Leo I. Brisbois


Leo I. Brisbois


United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Heurung v. Minnesota
(Jun 1, 2017)