AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVID MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. DIRECTOR HAROLD CLARKE, et al, Defendant(s).

By: Glen E. Conrad Chief United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION By: Glen E. Conrad Chief United States District Judge

David Meyers, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order entered May 8, 2017, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 20 days from the date of the order a statement of assets, an inmate account form, and a certified copy of plaintiff's trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint, obtained from the appropriate prison official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined during that six-month period, as well as the verified statement form. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 20 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.

ENTER: This 1st day of June, 2017.

/s/_________


Chief United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Meyers v. Clarke
(Jun 1, 2017)