AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL JOSEPH ROTONDO, Plaintiff, v. BEST BUY STORES LLC, Defendant.

DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge

APPEARANCES: MICHAEL JOSEPH ROTONDO
Plaintiff pro se
408 Weatheridge Drive
Camillus, New York 13031 DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge


DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Michael Joseph Rotondo brought this employment discrimination action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. On June 2, 2017, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed but that he be granted leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff timely filed an objection to the Report-Recommendation, and though premature and prior to the adoption or rejection of the Report-Recommendation by the undersigned, also filed an amended complaint.

Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In accordance with the same, this matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge Peebles for review of plaintiff's amended complaint.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; and

2. The file is referred back to Magistrate Judge Peebles for review of plaintiff's amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________


United States District Judge Dated: July 5, 2017


Utica, New York.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Rotondo v. Best Buy Stores LLC
(Jul 5, 2017)