Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL–CIO–CLC; Ronald D. Strait; Danny O. Ste v. ns, Plaintiffs–Appellees,

GRIFFIN

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Flint, No. 4:11–cv–15497—Gershwin A. Drain, District Judge.
Before: MERRITT, SUTTON, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.


On May 6, 2014, defendants filed a petition for panel rehearing, as well as a motion to stay consideration of the petition for panel rehearing, pending the Supreme Court's decision in M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, Supreme Court No. 131010. On May 19, 2014, the majority of this panel granted appellant's motion to stay consideration of the petition for rehearing. On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 926, 190 L.Ed.2d 809 (2015), which overruled this court's decision in UAW v. Yard–Man, Inc., 716 F.2d 1476 (6th Cir.1983).

We now GRANT appellant's motion for panel rehearing and REMAND the case to the district court for reconsideration, and further proceedings if necessary, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Tackett. The prior opinion of this panel, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing Energy, Allied Industries and Service Workers International Union v. Kelsey–Hayes Co., 750 F.3d 546 (6th Cir.2014), is accordingly VACATED. MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

I do not agree that the court should remand this case to the district court. I would conclude this case by deciding that the Kelsey–Hayes employees who are retired are entitled to vested health care benefits under the collective bargaining agreements.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United Steel v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.
(Jul 28, 2015)