AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KATHLEEN BOTTALICO et al., Respondents, v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.

Order entered May 20, 1969, denying defendant's motion for a protective order, unanimously modified on the facts and the law, without costs or disbursements, to provide that the examination of defendant's employees shall be in Jacksonville, Florida, and, at the election of plaintiffs, shall be by written interrogatories or open commission. If plaintiffs elect to examine by open commission, the parties shall pay their respective expenses, which shall be taxed as costs by the prevailing party. Otherwise the order is affirmed. The requirement that witnesses travel a thousand miles is onerous and likely unnecessary. If the witnesses should come to New York for the trial or for any reason prior thereto, plaintiffs shall be advised beforehand and accorded the opportunity of conducting the examination directed. (See Pakter v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Piel v. Lilly Co., 19 A.D.2d 810; Winds v. Hydropress, 279 App. Div. 1005.) Defendant's brief offers to submit the witnesses for examination in New York City about one week before trial.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and McNally, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOTTALICO v. SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD CO
(Dec 11, 1969)