Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE, EX REL. CUNAGIN CONSTRUCTION CORP., APPELLANT, v. CREECH, MAYOR, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Mandamus — Not available where adequate remedy by appeal — Court required to deny writ — Appeal from final order of administrative agency.

Per Curiam.

The written denial of the planning commission of the validity of the application for a building permit and its refusal to act on the same constituted the final act of respondents, the lawfulness of which was subject to review by appeal pursuant to Section 2506.01 et seq., Revised Code. Relator has failed to show or explain why that remedy was inadequate or unavailable.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals in denying the writ of mandamus is, therefore, affirmed on the authority of paragraph three of the syllabus of State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm., 11 Ohio St.2d 141.

Judgment affirmed.

TAFT, C.J., MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, DUNCAN and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE, EX REL. CUNAGIN CONSTR. CORP. v. CREECH
(Dec 17, 1969)