AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael W. SCANLAN, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

SAVOY, Judge.

This expropriation suit was consolidated for trial and appeal with the companion case of Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company v. Miller, 229 So.2d 182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1969), decided also on this date.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the judgment of the district court is amended so as to increase the award to defendants, Michael W. Scanlan, Jr., Lela Andrus Scanlan, and Carl Dean Scanlan, from $180.00 to $654.00, together with legal interest on all unpaid amounts from the date of the taking, until paid. In all other respects, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at plaintiff-appellee's costs.

Amended and affirmed. HOOD, J., dissents for reasons assigned in 229 So.2d 182 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1969).

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

HOOD, J., is of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY v. SCANLAN
(Jan 7, 1970)