BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, District Judge.
[ 1103] Charles Clinton Hunter, The Hayes Law Firm PC, Kingwood, TX, Jeff S. Westerman, Westerman Law Corp., Los Angeles, CA, Manfred Patrick Muecke, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman and Balint PC, San Diego, CA, Alexander Robert Safyan, [ 1104] Daniel L. Warshaw, Pearson Simon Warshaw LLP, Sherman Oaks, CA, Debra Brewer Hayes, Dennis Craig Reich, Reich and Binstock LLP, Houston, TX, Stephen M. Hansen, Law Offices of Stephen M. Hansen PS, Tacoma, WA, T. Brent Jordan, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman and Balint PC, Philadelphia, PA, Van Bunch, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman and Balint PC, Phoenix, AZ, Stephanie Yunjin Cho, Hausfeld LLP, San Francisco, CA, for George Williams et al.
Theane Evangelis Kapur, Michael J. Holecek, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Timothy W. Loose, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 107
BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL, District Judge.
Renee A. Fissher, Deputy Clerk.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.'s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 83.) After reviewing the parties' papers filed in support of and in opposition to this motion, in addition to hearing oral argument from the parties on the matter, the Court agrees with Defendant that Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim m their Second Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Accordingly, Defendant's motion is GRANTED.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
Defendant Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. (“Yamaha USA”) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Yamaha Motor Co. Ltd. (“Yamaha Japan”), a Japanese corporation. (Second Am. Consol. Class Action Compl. (“SAC”) ¶ 38.)
See SAC ¶ 38.) Among its business activities, Yamaha Japan designs and manufactures outboard motors for recreational boats. (Dkt. No. 78 at 1.) One model in particular lies at the center of this lawsuit: the first-generation F-series four-stroke outboard motor.
Plaintiffs are individuals who have purchased first-generation F-series outboard motors. (SAC ¶¶ 1–2, 18–37.) They allege that the first-generation F-series motor was flawed in its design, resulting in significant internal corrosion of the motor's dry exhaust system, which, if left untreated, ultimately causes the motor to fail prematurely. The SAC details the repair costs that each of the named Plaintiffs incurred after discovering corroded components of their outboard motors. It also describes the warranty coverage that Defendant provided to Plaintiffs' various products, which the Court has used to calculate the dates on which each Plaintiff's warranty expired. The following chart summarizes this information: