AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re JENNY F., Petitioner–Respondent, v. FELIX C., Respondent–Appellant.

GONZALEZ

Affirmed.
Douglas H. Reiniger, New York, for appellant. Geoffrey P. Berman, Larchmont, for respondent.
Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Patricia Colella of counsel), attorney for the child.



GONZALEZ, P.J., SAXE, RICHTER, FEINMAN, KAPNICK, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about February 22, 2013, which denied respondent father's motion to vacate a five-year order of protection entered after an inquest conducted upon his default, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of protection, same court and Judge, entered on or about December 3, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Respondent failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear at the hearing on the family offense petition ( see CPLR 5015[a][1]; see e.g. Matter of Yadori Marie F. [Osvaldo F.], 111 A.D.3d 418, 419, 974 N.Y.S.2d 71 [1st Dept.2013] ). His contention that he “totally forgot” about the hearing date and thought his employer would remind him of the date is unreasonable. Respondent was present during the scheduling of the hearing and it was his responsibility to ensure that he appeared on the scheduled date ( see e.g. Matter of Yadori, 111 A.D.3d at 419, 974 N.Y.S.2d 71). Further, the court properly denied his counsel's request for an adjournment, as counsel failed to offer any explanation for respondent's absence ( Matter of Keith H. [Logann M.K.], 113 A.D.3d 555, 556, 980 N.Y.S.2d 14 [1st Dept.2014], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 902, 2014 WL 1775882 [2014] ). Since respondent failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his default, we need not determine whether he offered a meritorious defense to the family offense petition ( see Yadori, 111 A.D.3d at 419, 974 N.Y.S.2d 71).

No appeal lies from the order of protection, which was entered upon respondent's default (CPLR 5511; see e.g. Matter of Nyree S. v. Gregory C., 99 A.D.3d 561, 562, 951 N.Y.S.2d 874 [1st Dept.2012], lv. denied 20 N.Y.3d 854, 2012 WL 6581989 [2012] ).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Jenny F. v. Felix C.
(Oct 2, 2014)