AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

ANTWON DEMETRIUS PEACOCK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

W. Earl Britt

ORDER

Having conducted an examination of petitioner's motion pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings and it appearing that dismissal is not warranted at this time, the United States Attorney is DIRECTED to file an Answer pursuant to Rule 5, Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, or to make such other response as appropriate to the above-captioned § 2255 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence, within forty (40) days of the filing of this order. Because petitioner asserts a challenge to his sentence based on the recent decision of United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir. 2011), pursuant to the standing order of this court No. 11-SO-3, the Office of the Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent petitioner in connection with these proceedings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve the Office of the Federal Public Defender with a copy of this order.

W. Earl Britt


Senior U.S. District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Peacock v. United States
(Nov 18, 2011)