Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Douglas LATTA, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell J. WILEY, etc., et al., Respondents.

Douglas Latta, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Bandler of counsel), for John T. Bandler, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented applications to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and for related relief,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the applications be and the same hereby are denied, and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, FREEDMAN, GISCHE, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Latta v. Wiley
(May 21, 2013)