AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Janet CHANG, etc., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Laraine BOTSACOS, etc., Defendant–Appellant.

MAZZARELLI

Maroney O'Connor LLP, New York (Ross T. Herman of counsel), for appellant. Daniel R. Wotman & Associates, PLLC, Great Neck (Daniel R. Wotman of counsel), for respondent.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, CATTERSON, ABDUS–SALAAM, MANZANET–DANIELS, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered August 10, 2010, after a jury trial, awarding plaintiff the total amount of $8,708,490, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve her arguments that entry of the judgment was untimely pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48(a) ( see McCue v. McCue, 225 A.D.2d 975, 976, 639 N.Y.S.2d 551 [1996] ), and that plaintiff abandoned the action pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.48(b) ( see Meldrim v. Hill, 260 A.D.2d 836, 839, 688 N.Y.S.2d 741 [1999] ). Were we to reach these arguments, we would find that the 60–day time limit in 22 NYCRR 202.48(a) “applies only where the court explicitly directs that the proposed judgment or order be settled or submitted for signature” ( Funk v. Barry, 89 N.Y.2d 364, 365, 653 N.Y.S.2d 247, 675 N.E.2d 1199 [1996] ). Here, there was no such explicit direction ( see Meldrim at 839, 688 N.Y.S.2d 741; McCue at 976–977, 639 N.Y.S.2d 551).

Defendant Thomas Cartelli was deposed before trial but had died by the time of trial. Contrary to defendant's contention, plaintiff's reading of Cartelli's deposition testimony at the trial did not violate the Dead Man's Statute (CPLR 4519; see Tepper v. Tannenbaum, 87 Misc.2d 829, 838, 386 N.Y.S.2d 936 [1976], revd. on other grounds 65 A.D.2d 359, 411 N.Y.S.2d 588 [1978]; CPLR 3117[a][3][i] ).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Chang v. Botsacos
(Feb 28, 2012)