AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In re: WILLIAM W. PIERCE, JR., Debtor, MAXIE E. HIGGASON, JR., CHAPTER 7TRUSTEE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

Bernice B. Donald

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0627n.06
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
AMENDED OPINION

Before: MOORE, SUTTON, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

Bernice B. Donald , Circuit Judge. Maxie E. Higgason, Jr., a Chapter 7 Trustee, brought a strong-arm proceeding against Appellant Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. (Vanderbilt) to avoid a lien claimed by Vanderbilt against William W. Pierce, Jr.'s manufactured home. Vanderbilt failed to submit its Certificate of Title and title lien statement to the county clerk in Pierce's county of residence for notation of its security interest on the Certificate of Title. We quite recently confronted virtually identical factual and legal issues in Vanderbilt Mortgage & Fin., Inc. v. Westenhoefer, No. 11-6216, (6th Cir. March __, 2013). There, we concluded, that a security interest in a manufactured home is not properly perfected under Kentucky law unless the Certificate of Title has been submitted to the county clerk in the debtor's county of residence for the security interest to be noted on the Certificate of Title by that clerk. That did not happen here. On the basis of Westenhoefer, we AFFIRM.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Higgason v. Vanderbilt Mortg. & Fin., Inc. (In re Pierce)
(Jul 2, 2013)