Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUGH MAURICE ALLEN WADE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WENELISA NAVARRO, M.D.; ISAIAS TESSEMA, M.D.; ERWIN ALDANA, M.D., Defendants - Appellees.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-01985-AW)

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Hugh Maurice Allen Wade appeals from the grant of summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Wade v. Navarro, No. 8:09-cv-01985-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 11 & entered Sept. 14, 2009; filed May 17 & entered May 18, 2010; Feb. 8, 2011). In addition, we decline to exercise continuing jurisdiction over Wade's case. See Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 404-05 (1974) (absent constitutional violations, federal courts should be reluctant to interfere with state prison administration). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Wade v. Navarro
(Feb 1, 2012)