AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

PHILLIP T. EDWARDS, ESQUIRE, Guardian Ad Litem of NAVAEH L. DESHIELDS, a Minor Child, Plaintiff, v. KIDDIE KOLLEGE INSTITUTE, Defendant.

Robert B. Young Judge

ORDER

Kiddie Kollege Institute ("Defendant") has filed a Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 50(b). This motion comes after a jury returned a verdict in favor of Phillip Edwards, Esq., guardian ad litem of minor child Navaeh DeShields ("Plaintiff") in a negligence action involving the abuse of the minor child in Defendant's daycare. Under Rule 50(b), the Court does not weigh the evidence, but rather views the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, in this case Plaintiff. In order for the Court to find in favor of Defendant, it must find that there is no legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find for Plaintiff. Based upon the rulings the Court made prior to trial, during trial, and after thoroughly considering the evidence again, the Court finds no basis to support the Rule 50 motion.

Atwell v. Rhis, Inc., 2007 WL 914648, at *1 (Del. Super. Feb. 26, 2007).

Id. --------

The Court has previously found a basis to allow Plaintiff's claims to proceed to the jury, and it continues to find that there is sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict regarding those claims. The allegation that Plaintiff produced no evidence of causation of injury to the minor is without merit. While the existence of injury was certainly disputed, testimony did exist that the child had been subjected to some handling that a jury could conclude was abuse which caused injury. There was no testimony supporting a claim for permanency as such, but there was no separate verdict, or even argument, for future expenses.

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law is DENIED.

SO ORDERED this 8 day of July, 2016

/s/ Robert B. Young


Judge RBY/lmc
Via File & ServeXpress

oc: Prothonotary
cc: Chase T. Brockstedt, Esq.



Brian D. Kent, Esq. (via email)


Jason M. Avellino, Esq.


Gerard X. Smith, Esq. (via email)


Opinion Distribution

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Edwards v. Institution
(Jul 8, 2016)