Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

United States of America, Plaintiff v. Ian Alexander Pincombe, Defendant

Jennifer A. Dorsey United States District Judge

Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

[ECF 77, 41]

Defendant Ian Pincombe stands charged with possession of child pornography and related offenses. These charges stem from an undercover "reverse sting" operation launched by Henderson Police Department Detective Tuan Yurek in response to Pincombe's personal advertisement on Craigslist. Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. heard Pincombe's motion to dismiss this case based on outrageous government conduct; found that Detective Yurek did not engage in outrageous conduct, and recommends that I deny Pincombe's motion. Objections were due by November 20, 2015, and Pincombe has neither filed an objection nor requested an extension to do so.

ECF 13

ECF 41, 70.

ECF 77. --------

"[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly,

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Report and Recommendation [ECF 77] is ADOPTED; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss For Outrageous Government Conduct [ECF 41] is DENIED. Dated: December 7, 2015.

/s/_________


Jennifer A. Dorsey


United States District Judge

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Pincombe
(Dec 7, 2015)