Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LAURA KRISTIN BAKER, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada


County. Hon. Darla S. Williamson, District Judge.


Judgments of conviction and concurrent, unified sentences of ten years, with


minimum periods of confinement of two and one-half years, for possession of


methamphetamine with intent to deliver, affirmed.


Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. Allred, Deputy


Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.


Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jason M. Gray, Deputy Attorney


General, Boise, for respondent.


Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

In separate cases, consolidated on appeal, Laura Kristin Baker was convicted of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, Idaho Code § 37-2732(a). The district court sentenced Baker to concurrent, unified terms of ten years, with minimum periods of confinement of two and one-half years. Baker appeals, contending that her sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Baker's judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Baker
(Jan 3, 2012)