AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

PAUL THOMAS BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff, v. Dr. JOHNNY E. BATES, et al. Defendants.

L. SCOTT COOGLER

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report on June 7, 2013, recommending that the defendants' special report be treated as a motion for summary judgment and, as such, that the motion be granted and this action dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been filed by any party.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.

____________________


L. SCOTT COOGLER


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Blankenship v. Bates
(Jul 1, 2013)