Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

EUSTACE ARRINDELL, Indi v. dually and as Administrator of the Estate of Marguerite Arrindell, deceased, Plaintiff,

WILLIAM M. SKRETNY

DECISION AND ORDER

There being no opposition thereto, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to state court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction will be granted and this case remanded to the New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie.

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Remand (Docket No. 118) is GRANTED.

FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this case to the New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie.

FURTHER, that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case upon transfer to the New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie.

SO ORDERED. Dated: March 1, 2013


Buffalo, New York


_______________


WILLIAM M. SKRETNY


Chief Judge


United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Arrindell v. Moscati
(Mar 1, 2013)