Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

STEPHEN CRAIG BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. KIM LEATHERWOOD, et al., Defendant.

ORDER

VICKI MILES-LaGRANGE, Chief District Judge

On August 10, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Doyle W. Argo issued a Report and Recommendation in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the motion for summary judgment of defendants Taylor, Jones, Munday and Leatherwood [docket no. 35] be granted and that the motion for summary judgment of defendant Sebenick [docket no. 35] be granted as to Counts One, Three, and Four of plaintiff's complaint, and denied as to Count Two of plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff was ultimately given until September 30, 2011 to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's objection was filed on September 8, 2011.

Accordingly, upon de novo review, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on August 10, 2011;
(2) GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendants Joseph Taylor, Michael Munday, Kathy Jones and Kim Leatherwood [docket no. 35];
(3) GRANTS the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Joseph Sebenick [docket no. 35] as to Counts One, Three, and Four of plaintiff's complaint and DENIES the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Joseph Sebenick as to Count two of plaintiff's complaint;
(4) ORDERS that judgment issue forthwith in favor of defendants Joseph Taylor, Michael Munday, Kathy Jones, Kim Leatherwood and against plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BURNETT v. LEATHERWOOD
(Sep 30, 2011)