AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ROTH GRADING, INC., d/b/a IMPACT ROLLER TECHNOLOGY, Plaintiff, v. H.M. MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO., Defendant.

Laurie Smith Camp

ORDER

Before the Court is the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 59), and the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Index of Evidence in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62). Both Motions are opposed. (See Filing No. 60 (opposition to Defendant's Motion); Filing No. 63 (opposition to Plaintiff's Motion).) Having considered the matters, the Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply will be denied, and the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Index of Evidence will be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. The Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 59) is denied;
2. The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Index of Evidence in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62) is granted; and
3. The Plaintiff shall submit its supplemental index of evidence on or before July 25, 2012.



BY THE COURT:

Laurie Smith Camp


Chief United States District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Roth Grading, Inc. v. H.M. Miller Constr. Co.
(Jul 20, 2012)