Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROMAINE FRANCIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the City of Richmond; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND; ANDERSON, Medical Worker; ROBERTSON, Captain of the City of Richmond Sheriff's Department, Defendants - Appellees, and STANLEY NELSON FURMAN, Doctor, Defendant.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00235-REP)

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Romaine Francis appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No. 3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Francis v. Woody
(Oct 18, 2011)